How my website went from 10 to 76 organic clicks in three months

On 18 April 2026, I launched the Danish version of my website. Since then, I have used it as an open test ground for the exact method I work by myself: a clear information architecture, a solid technical foundation, and content that needs to be useful for people, understandable for search engines, and usable in AI-based search results. This case does not show a polished result. It documents the concrete choices I have made, the data from Google Search Console after the first three months, and the areas that remain unresolved. The purpose is to show the process behind the growth, not just the flattering numbers.

The case in brief

In the first comparison period, the site received 10 organic clicks and appeared 1,140 times in Google’s search results. In the following period, this rose to 76 clicks and 28,300 impressions. That corresponds to:

• 66 more organic clicks
• Roughly 660% growth in organic clicks
• 27,160 more impressions in Google
• Roughly 2,382% growth in impressions
• An improvement in average position from 64.6 to 49.2
• 86 organic clicks and 29,440 impressions combined across the two periods

The starting point: very limited organic visibility

Before the new site went live, organic visibility was limited. In the first comparison period, Google Search Console recorded 10 clicks and 1,140 impressions. The average position was 64.6. An average position of around 65 does not mean that every keyword sat on page 6 or 7. The figure is an average across all recorded searches. It does show, however, that a large share of the site’s visibility sat so far down in the search results that the likelihood of a click was very low.

My first goal was therefore not to generate enquiries overnight. It was to build a foundation that could make the site visible for more relevant searches and give Google a clearer understanding of my topics, services and competencies.

How I have built the site

The results need to be seen in the context of the decisions I have made about structure, content and technology. The method does not consist of a single SEO trick, but of a series of connected choices designed to support each other.

The numbers in brief

A focused hub structure

Rather than creating a separate page for every conceivable keyword variation, I have gathered the content into a focused structure. The main area on search engine optimisation functions as the central subject-matter hub. It is supported by the areas of marketing knowledge, references, and cases. The individual pages are connected through relevant internal links, so that both visitors and search engines can more easily understand the relationship between topics.

I do not create pages purely based on a certain number of monthly searches. A new page has to be justified by at least one of the following:

• A documented information need
• A relevant search intent
• An important service or problem area
• A topic that supports the overall subject-matter structure
• A question potential customers genuinely need an answer to

This reduces the risk of many thin or overlapping pages. At the same time, it gives every new page a clear role within the overall information architecture. The hub structure cannot alone be proven as the cause of the growth, but the development in keywords and impressions suggests that Google is gradually starting to understand the site’s broader subject area.

A consistent quality framework, not identical pages

Every page follows the same overall quality framework, but the content is adapted to the specific search intent. The framework includes, among other things:

• A unique and descriptive meta title
• A meta description that explains the page’s value
• One clear H1
• An introduction that quickly answers the user’s primary need
• Logical H2 and H3 sections
• Internal links to relevant topics and services
• Standalone answers to key questions
• A clear next action for the visitor

I typically work with meta titles of around 35 to 60 characters and meta descriptions of around 140 to 160 characters, but relevance and clarity matter more than hitting an exact character count on every single page.

FAQ sections are only used when there are genuine questions that supplement the page’s main content. The answers are written so they can be understood without reading the whole page first. This makes the content easier to decode for users, traditional search engines and AI systems alike. That does not guarantee the content will be cited in an AI-generated answer. It does, however, increase the likelihood that these systems can identify, understand and correctly reuse the individual pieces of information.

First-person voice as a deliberate positioning choice

All content is written consistently in the first person. I have chosen not to write “we”, because I do not want to come across as a larger agency. Clients work directly with me, and the language needs to reflect that reality.

The first-person voice is therefore not purely a stylistic choice. It supports my positioning, makes the sender clear, and creates consistency across my texts, cases, services, and contact points. It also means that I personally have to stand behind the recommendations and results I present.

A technical foundation that supports the content

The site is built in WordPress with GeneratePress and WPML. Danish, English, and German are managed from the same installation. This technical setup was chosen to give me control over, among other things:

• Page speed and code weight
• Mobile experience
• Language versions
• Internal link structure
• Metadata
• Canonical tags and hreflang
• Reusable page elements
• The ongoing expansion of the site

Among other things, I have developed a fixed mobile contact bar through a GeneratePress Hook element. The contact bar automatically adapts to the selected language and makes it easier for mobile users to take the next step without first having to find the contact page. The contact bar does not create SEO results in itself, but it shows how I work across SEO, user experience, and conversion. Visibility has limited business value if visitors cannot simultaneously find a clear way forward.

Free tools as an independent entry point to the site

Alongside the regular content, I have built a separate hub of free tools. The hub is available in Danish, English, and German and includes:

• An SEO analysis
• An AI bot access checker
• A local SEO analysis
• A mini SEO audit

The purpose is to give visitors a chance to experience part of my method before they decide whether to contact me.

The tools also have their own search intent. They can therefore function as standalone entry points to the site and reach people who are not yet searching for a consultant, but who have a concrete problem they want to investigate. In the longer term, the tools can also create a basis for shares, mentions and relevant links. The case’s current data is not yet sufficient, however, to conclude how large an effect the tools hub will have.

Implemented structured data

To make the website’s content easier for search engines and AI systems to understand, I use structured data (Schema.org). Structured data helps Google and AI-based search systems identify what a page is about, who is behind the content, and how different pieces of information relate to each other.

Among other things, I use structured data for people, organisations, services, and relevant content types, wherever it fits the page’s actual content. The implementation happens primarily through Yoast SEO, which automatically generates the necessary schema markup on the website.

Structured data is an important part of making a website more understandable to both classic search engines and new AI search engines. It can help give AI systems better context when they assess and retrieve information from websites. It is not, however, a direct ranking factor or a guarantee of being shown in AI-generated answers; the quality of the content, authority, and the overall SEO structure still play a decisive role.

The results after three months

The comparison in Google Search Console shows the following development:

Metric	First Period	Second Period	Change
Organic Clicks	10	76	+66 clicks
Google Impressions	1,140	28,300	+27,160 impressions
Average Position	64.6	49.2	15.4 positions higher
Average CTR	1.0%	0.3%	Broader visibility across more search queries affected CTR

Clicks rose by roughly 660%, while impressions rose by more than 2,382%. The site was therefore shown more than 22 times as often in Google’s search results in the second period.

The average position improved by 15.4 positions. This is positive, but the figure should be interpreted with some caution. When a site starts appearing on many new searches, the new positions can also affect the average significantly.

The lower CTR is mainly due to the site now being shown on far more and broader searches after the optimisation. At the same time, total organic clicks rose significantly from 10 to 76, while visibility grew from 1,140 to 28,300 impressions.

The most important result at this stage is therefore the combination of more clicks, far more impressions, and visibility across a broader range of relevant searches.

Which searches are starting to develop?

The development can be seen, among other things, in three key keywords.

“What is SEO”

This search already had some limited visibility, but became markedly stronger in the following period:

• Clicks rose from 0 to 7
• Impressions rose from 242 to 1,831
• The average position improved from 85.7 to 64.3
• That corresponds to an improvement of 21.4 positions

The position is still far from the top of the search results, but the development shows that the page is being shown more often and is moving in the right direction.

“Technical SEO”

This search created no notable visibility in the first period. In the following period, it reached:

• 964 impressions
• An average position of 44.5

“SEO analysis”

This search likewise began to gain visibility in the following period:

• 2,142 impressions
• An average position of 44.7

Positions around 44 to 45 still only generate limited traffic. They are relevant nonetheless, because they show that Google is starting to connect the site with topics that previously generated no visibility at all.

In addition, searches such as “digital marketing”, “GEO optimisation” and “technical SEO analysis” have started to generate clicks or impressions. The site is therefore less dependent on a single topic than before.

This is an early indication that the overall subject structure is broadening. It is not yet proof of strong or stable rankings.

Why did CTR fall?

The average CTR fell from 1.0% to 0.3%. The most likely explanation is that the site is now being shown on far more searches, where positions still sit relatively far down. An impression at position 40 or 60 has a significantly lower likelihood of generating a click than an impression on page 1.

The drop in CTR is therefore not necessarily a sign that the titles or content have become less relevant. But it should not be ignored either. The next phase should focus on, among other things:

• Searches where pages already sit close to page 1
• Titles and descriptions with many impressions but few clicks
• Better alignment between search result and search intent
• Strengthening pages that sit between position 10 and 30
• Clearer differentiation from competing search results

The goal is not only to achieve more impressions. A larger share of that visibility needs to convert into relevant visits over time.

Building visibility in AI search and getting content cited

An important part of a modern SEO strategy is not only being found in classic Google results, but also being mentioned in AI-generated answers. I therefore work continuously on optimising the website’s content, structure and credibility, so that AI systems can more easily understand and use the information.

AI search is still a developing area, and there is no guarantee of being cited. Visibility in AI depends, among other things, on content quality, expertise, authority, technical SEO, internal link structure, and how clearly a website answers users’ questions. The focus going forward is therefore to continue working on valuable content, strong information structure and SEO optimisation, so the website has an even greater chance of being mentioned in both traditional search results and the AI search of the future.

What the results do not yet document

The case shows a clear development in organic visibility, but I want to be precise about what the figures do not show. I have not yet received enquiries or clients that can be attributed with certainty to the organic traffic from this period. This means that, at this stage, this is an SEO and visibility case, not a documented conversion or revenue case.

That matters, because clicks are not the final goal for a commercial website. The next question is whether visitors are relevant, whether they use the content, and whether they eventually get in touch. The next phase therefore includes both more visibility and stronger measurement of:

• Clicks on email and phone
• Use of the contact form
• Interaction with the free tools
• Visits to service and contact pages
• The path from informational content to commercial pages

I prefer to be open about that difference, rather than presenting growing impressions as evidence of a business effect that has not yet been measured.

My next priorities

The site is still at an early stage of development. The next improvements should not simply create more content, but strengthen the foundation that is already built.

1. Build further on the searches that already have visibility

I will first prioritise pages and searches that sit within realistic reach of page 1. Here, improvements to content, internal links, titles and search intent can potentially deliver more value than creating many new pages.

2. Improve conversion measurement

Contact points and tool interactions need to be measured more clearly, so I can distinguish between general traffic and visitors with genuine commercial interest.

3. Internal linking and link equity

An important part of SEO work is also building a strong internal link structure. Internal links help Google crawl the website, understand the connections between pages, and identify which pages matter most. By linking strategically between relevant pages, existing authority on the website is distributed, often referred to as link equity. For example, a strong page with many external links and high visibility can help strengthen related subpages through internal links.

A well-thought-out internal link structure helps not only Google but also AI systems understand the relationships between different topics, services and content types. It makes it easier for AI models to find, interpret and use information from the website when users ask relevant questions. The goal is therefore to create a logical information structure where users, Google and AI systems alike can navigate easily.

4. Review crawler access

Robots.txt and other access settings need to be reviewed, so I can deliberately decide which traditional search engines and AI crawlers should have access to which parts of the site. Access for an AI bot is not the same as visibility in an AI answer, but it is a necessary technical precondition if the content is to be crawlable by that service at all.

5. Build external credibility

The site still has limited external authority. I will therefore work on relevant mentions, professional contributions, collaborations, and links from credible websites. The focus should be on relationships and mentions that are relevant to my subject areas, not on collecting as many links as possible.

What the case shows about my way of working

The results are still early, but the case shows the way I work:

• I start with structure and search intent rather than random keywords
• I document the starting point before assessing the development
• I connect technical SEO, content, user experience and conversion
• I use data to prioritise the next effort
• I distinguish between visibility, traffic, enquiries and revenue
• I am transparent about both results and limitations

I do not consider 76 clicks a finished result. It is an early signal that the foundation is starting to work, and a data basis for the next decisions.

An early case, not a finished result

The site has achieved a combined 87 clicks and almost 30,000 impressions since Google Search Console began recording data. These are modest traffic figures in absolute terms, but the development from 10 to 76 clicks and from 1,140 to 28,300 impressions shows that the site has moved from very limited visibility to being found across a broader range of relevant searches. That is exactly the kind of development I want to document: not just the result, but the choices, measurements and priorities behind it.

It is also how I work with clients’ websites. I start with data, build a coherent foundation, and am clear about what the results can and cannot yet document.

Why choose Vester Marketing as your partner?

You work directly with me

Vester Marketing is not a large agency with multiple contact people and changing consultants. You work directly with me throughout the entire process. That means the person who examines your website and develops the strategy is also the person who explains the recommendations and follows the development. You therefore do not need to repeat your business’s needs every time a task changes hands. I get to know your website, your products and your target audience, and I use that knowledge across the whole engagement.

You get insight into the decisions

I do not want SEO to be a closed process where you only receive a report with a score and a long list of technical terms. I explain:

• What I found
• Why it matters
• What should be prioritised first
• What effect the change is expected to have
• How the development can subsequently be measured

This makes it easier for you to understand the recommendations, assess the priorities, and make decisions about your website.

I prioritise rather than just finding faults

An SEO analysis can quickly end up with hundreds of possible improvements. That does not mean all improvements are equally important, or that they should all happen at the same time. I prioritise recommendations based on, among other things:

• Expected effect
• Business relevance
• Search intent
• Technical necessity
• Resource requirements
• The connection to the rest of the site

You therefore do not just find out what can be changed. You also get an assessment of what should be changed first, and what can reasonably wait.

I work with both people and search engines

A website should not only be findable. It should also be understandable, credible, and easy to use once a potential customer lands on the page. That is why I work with content that:

• Answers the user’s most important questions
• Supports the desired action
• Has a clear structure
• Can be understood by search engines
• Can be identified and used by AI systems
• Fits the business’s tone and level of expertise

The goal is not to write text for an algorithm. The goal is to make the business’s knowledge clearer and more accessible, both to people and to the systems that help them find information.

I do not promise results I cannot document

SEO is affected by competition, market, technical platform, existing authority, and search engines’ ongoing changes. I therefore do not promise specific rankings or a specific number of clients. Instead, I document the starting point, explain my recommendations, and follow the relevant data. When something works, I build on it. When results do not develop as expected, I investigate why and adjust the effort. This case is an example of that approach. I show the growth, the drop in CTR, and the fact that the visibility has not yet created documented client enquiries. You get that same transparency when I work with your website.

You get a foundation that can develop over time

My goal is not only to create a short-term improvement on a few keywords. I work to build a coherent structure that can expand as the business gains new services, products, markets, or content needs. This includes, among other things:

• A clear information architecture
• Stronger internal connections between pages
• Reusable content principles
• A technical foundation that supports the development
• A clear method for ongoing measurement and optimisation

The result should be a website that is not only optimised today, but that is easier to keep developing tomorrow.

Frequently asked questions about the case study

Should I take a look at your website?

I can help you identify where your website is losing visibility, which pages have the greatest potential, and which improvements should be prioritized first. You’ll receive an honest assessment of both the opportunities and limitations, along with a concrete explanation of what the next steps should be. Read about my references and how I work with different industries.

Reference: J.A. Tømrer & Snedkerfirma ApS
Reference: Passion for AV
Reference: La Bohème
Marketing for a law firm
Marketing for the construction industry
Marketing for e-commerce